Search this blog

mei 20, 2014

I like this discussion!

'Liking' is a concept that is wildly used in social media. In a social business context a 'like' can mean lots of things: appreciation, support, saying 'yes' to something, or simply liking something. For business there is definatley value in using 'likes'. 
Through my likes count I can see if a certain blog post or file is popular, so it might encourage me to share more stuff like that.

Since the introduction of IBM Connections 4.5 you can also like a forum discussion, or a response to a topic or question.





You might think, "so what? That's just a tiny feature!" True, it doesn't seem to be a big thing.

What does this tiny feature mean for applicability to business?
Forum discussions can appear messy: long trees of responses, and the direction of the discussion can go sideways as it evolves. Very often without proper management it is actually going nowhere - or eveyrwhere. When forums are used as a business process for brainstorming, it is important to follow that process, evaluate and THEN: do something with it. The forum shouldn't be the end point, but should be the START of a new project or activities. But how do you keep an overview of what is being said, what wis most opular - or voted for - and which topics should be taken for next action?

A like for a topic gives direction to where the discussion is going. Just as in real life ~ when a discussion is taking place face-to-face ~ you can tell what contributions are accepted or endorsed by the group of people participating in the discussion.
Without 'likes' it may be unclear where the discussion is going, and it may be hard to 'end' the discussion. With likes it becomes clear what topics are generally supported by the people in the group. 

The same is true for topic responses. Likes on responses can stop unwanted directions (no likes), and stimulate the desired direction. A like can even be used as an RSVP: when posting a question like 'Who's interested in ...'.

So liking topics and responses can actually make a discussion more suited for a business process, where we can take some topics and move them on to next actions.

mei 17, 2014

Coachmarks: snelle tips voor nieuwe functies IBM Connections app

Sinds 16 mei 2014 is de IBM Connections mobiele app versie 4.7.0. uitgekomen.

Nieuw in versie 4.7.0 van de IBM Connections mobile app is Coachmarks.
Coachmarks, is een nieuwe functie, die voorziet in een context handleiding van nieuwe functies als je voor het eerst inlogt op een account. Coachmarks is een instructionale overlay voor apps. Door coachmarks in te zeten kun je gebruikers wat tips geven over bijvoorbeeld nieuwe functionaliteit, door instructies op het scherm te geven in de daadwerkelijke app. Coachmarks zijn handig. Ze geven de gebruiker net een zetje in de juiste richting. Zie het als een kleine visuele aansporing om nieuwe dingen te ontdekken.


Korte handige tips
Het is algemeen bekend dat gebruikers uitgebreide handleidingen niet lezen. Ze willen gewoon snel aan de slag, zonder eerst de UI te moeten aanleren. Dit is de paradox van de actieve gebruiker: die wil in zo'n kort mogelijk tijdsbestek en met zo min mogelijk inspanning, effectief geavanceerde functionaliteit leren gebruiken. De paradox zit hem in het feit dat juist het leren van en het correct gebruiken van deze geavanceerde functionaliteit de gebruiker nu juist tijd zal besparen!
De kunst van goede coachmarks is dat je niet teveel instructie geeft. Omdat je niet de overlay kunt lezen en tegelijkertijd de app gebruiken, zul je de hint of tip moeten onthouden, om dezelater toe te passen. Het korte-termijn geheugen kan niet heel veel onthouden, en de informatie zal na 20 seconden vervagen. Wanneer je de tips ook alleen geeft daar waar de gebruiker zich op een bepaald moment (voor de eerste keer) bevindt (in de context van het werk), en deze kort houdt, dan zal de coachmark het meest effectief zijn.
Coachmarks zijn dus geen uitgebreide handleiding, waarin je alles gaat uitleggen, maar korte tips die binnen een bepaalde context gegeven worden. Ze zijn daarom uitermate geschikt voor het tonen van 'What's new' informatie van apps.

Impressie van Coachmarks voor Connections Mobile app versie 4.7.0:








New IBM Connections app provides glimpse into Connections Next

On may 16 2014 IBM has released a new IBM Connections mobile app for iOS, Android and BlackBerry.

This new version 4.7.0. provides a glimpse into what is coming in Connections Next which will be released for Smartcloud may 21 2014!

Compatibility
iOS: Requires iOS 6.0 or higher. Compatibel with iPhone, iPad and iPod touch. This app is optimised for iPhone 5.
Android: Requires Android 2.3.3 and higher.

Version 4.7.0 for iPhone and iPad
  • New iOS 7 Look and Feel
  • Coachmarks, are a new feature, which will provide in context tutorial of new features when you first login to an account.
  • New navigation model to provide easy and customizable access to your content:
    • The new History view allows you to easily see where you have been in the app.
    • Quickly access content that you use the most by adding it as a favorite
    • Reorder your Connections apps in the navigation to best meet your needs
  • Search and filter activity stream items
  • New Blogs look and layout!
    • Easily access and navigate your blogs in the new Blogboard
    • Want to read a blog entry but don't have time now? Mark it to read later.
    • Use the time line to easily scan through the entries in a blog
  • When you access a Community, see what's been happening. The updates view is now the default view shown.
  • Access events in a Community and set an alarm on the device for an event.
  • Copy a link to content so you can share it with others.

Here are some inpressions of the new Connections app for iPad:





Here are some inpressions of the new app for iPhone: 





 

NB! Note to our customers running iOS6: In a future update we will be requiring iOS 6.1 as the minimum iOS level to install new updates.

Version 4.7.0 for Android
  • New Look & Feel
  • New navigation for easy and customizable access to your content:
    • New History view to easily see where you have been
    • Access content you use most by adding it as a favorite
    • Reorder your apps in the navigation
    • Copy a link to content to share with others
  • Search & filter activity stream items
  • New Blogs look!
    • Access your blogs in the new Blogboard
    • Mark blog entries to save and read later
  • Multi-window support
  • Note: In a future update we will only support Android 4.0+

Here are some impressions of the new Connections app on Android phones:








 

januari 29, 2014

Super collaboration, super value!


With the current available tools in IBM Connections and some add-ons like Connections Content Manager (CCM) and IBM Docs, collaboration can really take a productivity flight!

Often clients wonder what tools they should be getting. When do we use Files, or should we use the CCM Libraries? What can we do with a Wiki? When is IBM Docs interesting? I tell them, it all depends on the business goals the organization has, or what collaboration needs their employees have to get their work done faster, more efficient and more efficient.

Talking about productivity… what are the productivity gains of new ways of collaborating with IBM Connections Files, Wikis, or IBM Docs versus old ways (file hares and email attachments)?

Comparing collaboration methods efficiency

Imagine you are collaborating on a piece of information with 3 others and you need to review each other’s work before you can finalize it.
What are the differences in using the different tools from a productivity perspective?


Collaborating on a file sent as email attachment

Let’s do a quick test:
How many files (copies) will you get when collaborating through e-mail with 3 others and 2 revision rounds?
a. 4
b. 10
c. 12
d. 52 
Tip: remember you need to save, send and receive copies every time a review is done.

Before you take a peek at the correct answer below, let me elaborate:
Collaborating on a file requires creating it, saving it to a folder, and sending it as an attachment in an email. Then the receivers get an email with the attachment, which they save in a folder, then start editing the file, and save it again (either as a new version copy, or overwrite the old one), then send it back through their email. The original creator gets 3 emails with attachments, and saves these to a folder, then needs to merge them into one new copy manually skipping through the contents. And for the second review round we repeat the whole process again!

Now for the answer: it’s 52 !
And this is why:


I could also work it out like this, try it for yourself by writing down each and every step. Count all the copies for all the steps in the process of working on a file and sending it through email: remember there is a file saved in a folder, a file send in an email, a file received in an email in every step by every person!

It becomes apparent that collaborating together on information through email attachments is not very efficient. In fact you could say the tipping point for effective email collaboration is with 2 people and only one revision round:


How can collaboration using Files, Wikis or IBM Docs improve efficiency so that employees can be more productive?

You could look at efficiency in the collaboration process: the total time spent: how much effort and time does it take to work together, and what is the turnaround (the time spent for a whole process of collaboration).

Collaborating using IBM Connections Files

With Files there are the following productivity gains:
  • Collaborating in one central place, with only one version and everyone can work with the latest version.
  • To prevent making changes at the same time people can lock the file before they edit it, and then unlock it for the next person to start their editing.
  • Every reviewer can see the work done by the previous one, so there are no duplicate efforts, and no merging is necessary
  • Apart from collaboration in the file (edit it), people can also use comments. Comments can be questions, tips or remarks about the content, instead of changing the content. Sometimes you want to give advice but not change the file itself.
  • Every reviewer can see the comments made by others so there are no duplicate efforts.
  • The owner of the file can easily take the comments and make changes to the file accordingly, without having to undo changes in the file, or remove the MS Word style comments.
  • Comments in Files remain, unlike comments in a Word file, after the file is finalized.
  • It’s easy to see all the different versions, and the owner can revert to an older version or even restore it.
All this together makes the total time spent on the file by the 4 people a lot less, and because there is no need to await emails with the changes the turnover is also much less.

Collaborating using an IBM Connections Wiki

If we would use a Wiki to do the same collaboration, there would even be more productivity gain, especially in turnover time.
Next to the automatic versioning, and comments Wikis allow people to work on their own peace of the puzzle, simultaneously, because each can work on their own pages, and afterwards a structure for the whole can be formed through wiki links and peer and child pages movement.
Another great thing about using a Wiki for documentation that is continuously updated, is that in order to change parts of the information only that particular page needs to be updates, and not the whole document as with a file). And it is immediately clear to readers which page was updated.

Collaborating using IBM Docs

Using IBM Docs for true co-creation of a file will result in the following productivity gains, on top of those with using IBM Connections Files: almost no turnover time.
True co-creation can occur, because all reviewers can work in the same file at the same time, resulting in almost no turnover time. It’s like sitting in the same room all writing on the whiteboard at the same time. There is no waiting on each other’s work, and on top of that the reviewers can communicate about their work using chat.

Fantastic collaboration analogy
Compare collaborating on a file in a sequential way - as with Email attachments – with collaborating on a file simultaneously – as with IBM Docs - with this analogy.

Musicians that each play an instrument in a song each record their part separately and sequential in a studio and finally it is all merged into a song. But suppose they would all play their instrument together. I mean, not as a band live show, but REALLY together:

Watch this: Walk of the Earth playing Gotye ‘s Somebody that I used to know.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9NF2edxy-M 

november 12, 2013

Ease on down the road

The road to social collaboration goes through Notes 9


What if a company is not inclined to social, where collaborative work is being done mostly through email, and the general idea is social is not for them because employees need to 'just get to work' ?
Well, you start easing their way in to social, without really saying the 's' word.


I do agree fully with the statement employees should be doing their work. I also believe social collaboration IS work. Whilst having said that, I also am aware that for quite a few companies management and employees themselves don't see the 'work' in social yet.

collaboration for logistics

Recently I started with a new client. A logistics company that has been doing very well, and has seen growth all over in a generally struggling logistics industry. And they are now moving to IBM Notes 9. One of their offices is currently using MS Outlook, but all the others worldwide are using Zimbra for e-mail and calendering, along with Sparks for instant messaging. What, you never heard of Zimbra and Sparks? Me neither. And that's one of the reasons for their move to IBM Notes. They picked IBM Notes over MS Outlook, mainly because of the long term plans for more application workflows and the open character of the platform.

Email and chat is the main form of collaboration for employees. They have to work fast, react to changing situations fast, and talk to people all over the world. So they rely on efficient communication and further collaboration. Yet they also have a problem with huge email boxes. Most are over 5GB, some 10GB.

Ease their way into social

Even though in general the value of social wasn't immediately evident, the IT manager was more open to it, and we've been able to convince them to start with the Files and Profiles entitlement that comes with IBM Notes 9. The company doesn't have any kind of employee directory as of yet, so using Profiles for this is a perfect solution. We're not saying "here's something social which is called Profiles", but we're taking the angle of a 'Who's Who' listing. And along with Files, employees are able to share their files to collaborate on them with colleagues from all over the world. Linked to Profiles it's easy to find someone elses files, if they have shared them with you or publicly.

Within their Notes Sidebar they have the following panels avaliable: Sametime, Statusupdates, Files, and Social People.

Share files easily

In the workshops on the 'move to IBM Notes' the general reaction to Files was pretty good. People saw some real value in sometimes sharing files through here, rather than on network drives. And ofcourse having to email to notify, and have all kinds of comments in seperate emails in different email boxes instead of having those in context of the file itself.

Using the Files plugin in Notes employees can find, share and collaborate on files right from their email.


Some pluspoints they saw were:
  • Being able to control who specifically you share a file with (in contrast to network drive where you share all files with an IT set group), and with what rights (reader, editor);
  • Being able to access their files through a mobile device like an iPhone or iPad;
  • Being able to always have the lates version of a file, without having to look for it in emails or local folders or asking to have the latest version sent to them again.
  • Allmost everyone mentioned their leave of absence excel sheet to be shared publicly through Files, so they would always have the most recent version of it.

Find you colleagues

Profiles seemed to catch employees' attention when we demonstrated how it could help locate an expert. The example we used (you need an expert on import rights in China) was recognized as being valuable. Right now the only way to find such an expert is calling around until you would be referred to the right person (if that would be the result at all!). Especially if you consider Jan de Rijk to be a continually growing company, where not knowing your direct colleagues, or even know of them is becoming ever more present.

There is some resistance in the company to getting a full-blown 'Who's Who' with private information and a photograph. So we decided not to pre-populate the Profiles with a picture or personal addresses. All that's filled in is the name, email address, telephone number. So we're leaving it up to individual employees to fill in what they think is appropriate for them. Like the use of tags, and the search functionality, so Profiles will actually work like it did in the example we showed. Most times employees need some guidance, or tips if you will, what kind of keywords to add to your Profile. Like more meaningful terms for your job role then the official one says (i.e. 'manager' of 'HR'doens't really say anything about what you know, what you can do. So maybe add WHAT you are manager of, what field of expertise, and also what country you are working in).

As an add-on to the standard plugins for Files and Statusupdates and the Search bar in Notes for searching through Profiles, we created a Social People plugin. This plugin displays the colleagues in someone's network, allows a Profiles search where a search can be done on names, or expertise. By displaying the Social People plugin in the Sidebar we are bringing Profiles a little more to the attention of the employees, as it is much more visible now.





We held workshops at all the offices where they would be migrated during that time. And afterwards they receive a follow-up mail from the servicedesk, guiding them through their first set-up steps and providing them with a manual and more relevant information like the webmail address, the Connections address, iPhone/iPad or Android mail/calendar access, and the IBM Connections app setup.

Shared through Files ofcourse, where this information can be easily updates without having to notify all emploeyees again by email of the changes!



juli 30, 2013

From Notes to Outlook, and back to Notes again

One of the many things I do is assist companies and their employees dealing with the changes involved in an email platform migration. This week has been funny, as I have consulted one client to make the move from Notes to Outlook, while the next day I helped another with the transition from Outlook to Notes. Even though it's just moving from one type of Mail and Calendar to another, and therefore the change seems to be not so big, there are some pain points.

inform about change: when, why, how, and what

The main focus on such migration projects is on getting employees prepared and informed about what is going to happen, when and how it is going to happen and make the transition as easy as possible. The latter is being done by getting a group of ' heavy users' or ' ambassadors' to get heads up of all the functionality changes, and letting them prepare communication and documentation. It is important to inform all the employees in a timely and repetitive manner about what's going to change, and why. Employees will have questions like 'will I still be able to find my older emails?' , or 'can I keep my contacts, and will they sync with my mobile?' And you need to have an answer ready.

So before the actual migration, it's important to have a group of people experience the change for themselves and being able to set up a list of important functionality changes in their company or line of business specifically (the way it was versus the way it will be), some guidelines on how to use some functionality and have FAQ documentation or some quick reference cards available.

some changing features require a new way of working

In all my years of doing migration workshops I have learned all the specific differences in functionality and the effects these have on doing your work (as you know it now). Here's some interesting differences between Notes and Outlook that are important to address, as they may require a different work manner or work agreements:

All Documents and searching
Outlook has no All documents, so when Notes users are used to searching through their All documents they need to learn a new way. Searching through (full text search) your complete Outlook mailbox is no problem, but with All documents it's also possible to sort on columns (Who, Subject, Date, Size) which is a different way of searching.

Read / Unread marks
In Outlook the unread mark means the email is unread. In Notes the unread mark means YOU have not read that email. This is particularly important for group mailboxes and for delegates. If a secretary is looking at the managers email in Outlook they see which emails are read/unread, but not by whom: it could be the email was read by the manager or by themselves. The manager sees exactly the same read/unread marks. In a shared mailbox, where multiple people are working in it, in Outlook the general way of working is they pick up the unread messages. Employees can rely on that if a message is marked read, somebody else has already picked it up. In Notes, that is not the case. A colleague may have read and picked up the message, but it only displays as read for that employee, not the other colleagues. They still see an unread message. Therefore, in Notes another way of collaborating is required. Maybe with the use of folders (a folder for each employee, or folders for the status in the process: in progress and closed). Or maybe through the use of Follow Up Flags.

attachments to email messages
Attaching files to an email is different in Notes and Outlook: in Notes an attachment can be put inside the body of the message, where Outlook will always display it in a separate bar at the top of the message, near the Subject. There are pros and cons for each way. It's just different.

An attachment in a Notes email message
An attachment in an Outlook email message































Mail and Calendar delegation
In Notes delegation is pretty straightforward and therefore easy to set up. Delegation can be set to give another employee access to just your Calendar, To Do and Contacts, or your Mail, Calendar, To Do and Contacts. The next step is to decide how much access (read, create, edit) on all of these components. In Outlook delegation access can be set up at a much more granular level, providing much more variation and detail but requiring a lot more clicks and knowledge. So access can be granted to another employee on each component separately To Do, Contacts, Calendar, Mail) with different roles in place to decide how much access is granted, and furthermore access to Mail can be specified for each mail view and folder separately So a secretary could get access to the Inbox, Sent and some folders, but not to a specific folder where confidential email is delivered to through a rule for example.

Outlook Folder permissions





















Notes Access and Delegation















Delegates in Notes send email from the managers mailbox, where they create a new message. The message will be automatically sent from the manager (displayed to recipients as sender), sent by the secretary. In Outlook the secretary creates an email message from their own mail box, and uses the From field to specify the message is from the manager. When a delegate sends the message this way, recipients will see the text [Delegate Name] on behalf of [Manager Name] next to From.

Choosing the manager's mailbox to send the mail from in Outlook


















Signatures
Outlook can store several different e-mail Signatures, where Notes can only store one. Where users are used to sending email messages in different languages or roles in Outlook it is fairly easy to add a different Signature. In Notes there is only one to attach, so the workaround here to using multiple in different context is by creating a stationary with each Signature in it. Also Outlook gives the option to attach a different Signature to a new message and to replies/forwards. This prevents e-mail conversations to be cluttered with long signatures.

Organizing through color categories
Color categories in Outlook and Notes start from a different concept. In Outlook Categories have been around for a long time. They give the option to set up category colors along with a label that can be manually assigned to emails and appointments. It can also be assigned through rules. There is one shared list for both Mail and Calendar. In Notes the categories colors for Mail and Calendar are completely separate. In Mail colors can be assigned automatically based on who the sender of the email is. In the Calendar the Color Categories (available since Notes 9) are based on the Categories that have been available for a long time. Calendar entries that are assigned a category (manually) will display in the Calendar in the corresponding color. Both the color categories in Outlook and Notes Calendar are great for distinguishing between types of entries (travel, @Home, Office per location/building, Holiday, Client, etcetera). Both in Outlook and in Notes it's possible to filter/view Calendar entries by category.

Available, Unavailable, or Free ?
Availability settings in Outlook and Notes are a bit different. In Outlook you may choose to create an appointment or meeting and Show as: Free, Working elsewhere, Tentative, Busy, Out of Office, Outside of working hours. In Notes the options are partially pre-configured depending on the type of entry (Appointment, Meeting, Anniversary, Reminder), and the options are: Available (for Anniversary and Reminder default, and for Appointment checkbox Mark available), Busy (Already something scheduled), and Unavailable (outside working schedule).

Mark available checkbox marks meeting as available instead of busy






















Meeting Planner in Outlook











Show as allow to specify for a meeting if you should be marks as busy or available etc.












Specifically for users moving from Notes to Outlook the status Free is a bit confusing. In Dutch Free is considered off work. But what is meant here in Outlook is Available (for work!).

Rooms
Booking Rooms directly from an appointment in Notes helps employees to Find an available room, even before sending the request, or looking at the Planner. Notes will show rooms available based on date/time, AND room capacity (number of invitees and how many people the room can hold). In Outlook when booking a room you need to view the Planning Assistant to see the selected room's availability, and even then it does not take into account the room capacity.

It is best to install the Room Finder add-on in Outlook which will in fact display rooms based on date/time and capacity. The Room finder will display in the right sidebar.

















This is not an extensive list of feature differences. But it does provide the main differences that have some impact on the way people work. When confronted with a migration, it is wise to inform employees about these differences in particular and work with them to change the way they work using the new tool, so they can achieve the same result in the end.


juli 10, 2013

Working to a new way of structuring files

As a collaboration consultant I am often confronted with employees wanting to do their work in the same manner they alsways did, in a new software environment. Being confronted with a new software environment (ANY new environment, regardless of vendor or type), employees struggle with how to do things the way they do things now - to the way we do things in the new environment. Why do they struggle? Because a new software environment may bring new features and functionality, may have a very different look&feel, or may lack existing functionality. Or it could even be that the whole philosophy behind the software is completely different or opposite, requiring a different look at 'how we do things'.

It often is a daunting, but inspiring task, to aid employees in this journey from the way they work now, to the way they work new. It is my job to get behind ' the way work is done now' to 'why work is done this way now'. It's important because from the why, we can explore new ways to achieve the same result!

This week I consulted with a client using IBM Connections 4 on how to shift the work for a consultation body or representative advisory board from collaborating and communicating through e-mail and shared network drives to a moderated community using tools as statusupdates, a wiki, files, and an activity for organizing meetings for several sub-bodies.


The problem at hand

So what is the difficulty here? The way work is done now is: using a shared network drive with a big folder tree, and using e-mail to communicate and send files in some sort of workflow.

The organization we speak of here wants to move away from shared network drives to a more efficient way of collaboration and communication through IBM Connections. So one of the moderators started a Community to use instead. But a question came up around organizing files so they can be easily added, and found. They wanted to know "How can they structure files in a manner that they are used to, and so that the list doesn't become a chaotic large list". Bascially: how can we add all our files from the shared drive folder hierarchy structure that we have now to the Community in IBM Connections?

Well, before I can answer this question and get into how to do work in a new way, I need to explain something about IBM Connections and it's organizing possibilities. Let me tell you something about folders and tags.

Folders versus tags

In IBM Connections structuring and organizing is done using tags. Tags are keywords, or labels, that describe something (i.e. a file) so that it can easily be found later. Tags are handy as I can add multiple labels, so I can find my file based on a selection of one, ore more tags.

It's not very different from the way we use folders, really. Not when you look at it from the purpose perspective: both folders and tags help to find back your files. They are very different though from a visual perspective, which is deeply rooted into our system of structuring things.
Folder structures are very visible, and represent what we have been doing for thousands of years: put pieces of paper (dccuments, or files) into organized compartments such as vases (scrolls were placed in vases), bookcases, and later on filing cabinets. Visually that is how we picture organizing. Computers elaborated on this concept, even though their search capabilities really didn't require that. Even the icon for the Files tool in IBM Connections is a filing cabinet!

No folder hierarchy in IBM Connections 4

If you are working with files in IBM Connections you are faced with some limitations: folders cannot be created within a Community but only through your own ' My Files'. Fom your My Files you may share the folder with a Community. And there is no real folder structure possible as you can not create sub-folders.

This literally means that the team cannot keep doing work the way they do now. They need to have a way of structuring their files in the IBM Connections Community using a folder hierarchy.

Yes, I know IBM Connections 4.5 provides more folder functionality and structuring through IBM Docs libraries or CCM libraries. But these are not an option for this group right now, and may not be for a while. Therefore I don't believe in telling them 'that will be available in a newer version' as it is not a solution for them at this time. And, truthfully, I am not too happy about more folder hierarchy, as it may cause employees to not ever shift away from old ways of working to more efficient ways of working, which I believe tags are.

The solution to this problem is to move away from the folder principle alltogether and start using tags to organize files, or to work with a mix of folders for the first level, and work with tags also to manage different types of files within those folders. Using tags instead of folders can be setup by recreating the folder names as tags, where each folder and subfolder gets it's own tag. Or re-think the folder structure.

Re-thinking folder structures

Why did we use the folder hierarchy in the first place? When you get down to the reason why a folder structure was created, and start from there when you think of your tagging system, that might work better.

folder hierarchy
Ofcourse it all comes down to findability! Using folders in a structured way is because something in 'subfolder A' of 'folder 1' has a relation. Now, what would happen if we would use these seperate tags 'a' and '1' ? The relation between the two (a and 1) would not be obvious. But what if we would use the combined tag 'a1' instead?









When looking for files in the sub folder A in the old way, you would expand folder 1 and click on sub folder A to see it's content. In the new way you would have to search within the Community for files containing the tags 1 and a (in case you used seperate tags), or a1 (in case you used combined tags). You can do a search within the Community, and then click the Files tab to only show results form files.






The result will be exactly the same! A list will be displayed showing files that are tagged 'a1'!


Search results on a1 tag